Legal Opinion

State v. Dahl

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1989No. Cr. 880315PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Linda Dahl brings this appeal from a jury verdict finding her guilty of possession of a controlled substance with intent to manufacture or deliver. Prior to trial, Dahl had moved the court for an order suppressing evidence obtained as the result of a search warrant. The motion was denied. On appeal, Dahl asserts that the information provided to the magistrate, based upon the statement of an informant, was insufficient to establish probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant, and argues that the evidence obtained as a result of the search should be suppressed.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. State v. RingquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. MischeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. DymowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. BirkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. StewartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. HolzerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API