Legal Opinion

State v. Birk

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1992No. Cr. 910150PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Timothy A. Birk appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on a conditional plea of guilty under Rule 11(a)(2), N.D.R.Crim.P., to manufacturing a controlled substance, i.e., marijuana. Birk asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the incriminating evidence because there was a lack of probable cause for a warrant to search his home. We disagree and, accordingly, we affirm the judgment of conviction.

The sole basis for issuance of the search warrant was the November 21, 1990, sworn affidavit of Bismarck police officer Roger Becker, who…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. DamronNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. HageNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. UtvickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. WoehlhoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. OchoaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API