Legal Opinion
MacLaren v. B-I-W Group Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 19, 1975No. 70 CIV. 5348 (MP)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLACK, District Judge.
This is a suit arising under the patent laws in which the inventor and patentee, Maclaren, and his American licensee, Bell, charge defendants B-I-W Group Incorporated 1 and Cross River Products, Inc., with wilful infringement of United States Letters Patent No. 3,390,893, issued to Maclaren for “Structures for Folding Baby-Carriages, Chairs and the Like” on July 2, 1968.
In its answer, B-I-W denied infringement and asserted that the patent is invalid on the grounds of (1) obviousness and lack of novelty and utility, (2) insufficient disclosure of the invention,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- New Hampshire Bankers Ass'n v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kenneth Reiner and Frank A. Klaus, Jr., D/B/A Kaynar Company and Kaynar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. I. Leon Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Maclaren v. B-I-W Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Leesona Corporation v. Varta Batteries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Sims v. MacK Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Westphal v. FawziCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- Louis Marx & Co., Inc. v. Buddy L Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.