Legal Opinion
Fox v. Workman
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 14, 1907No. Civ. No. 322PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTaggart, J.
Petitioner applied to the superior court for a writ of mandate, which application was denied. He then moved for a new trial in the said proceeding, which motion was overruled. This appeal is from the court’s ruling on the motion.
Petitioner is the owner and holder of certain street improvement bonds issued by the city of Los Angeles in accordance with the provisions of the street improvement bond act as amended in 1899. The respondent, at the times hereinafter mentioned, was the city treasurer of said city.
On October 5, 1901, the owner of the lots upon which said bonds were a lien, having…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ellis v. WitmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- McClatchy v. MatthewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by8 opinions
- Spaulding v. DesmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Lotus Car Ltd. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Lotus Car Ltd. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- English v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Loveland v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.