Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. Desmond

California Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1922No. S. F. No. 10,057PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an original application for the issuance of a writ ofmandamus directed to Harry G. Denton, who has been regularly substituted as a defendant in the place and stead of M.J. Desmond, deceased, directing the said Denton, as clerk of the city of Sacramento, to file the oath of plaintiff as the alleged "city collector" of said city. Plaintiff bases his right to have such oath filed upon the provisions of the charter of said city known and hereinafter referred to as the "Charter of 1911" (Stats. 1911, Extra Sess., p. 305), which provided for a "city commission" in which was vested the power…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sherman v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Bannerman v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State ex rel. George v. SwiftNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  4. County of Yolo v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Brooks v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Schabarum v. California LegislatureCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Dufton v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Taylor v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Oakland Municipal Improvement League v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Stout v. Democratic County Central CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API