Legal Opinion

Mayfield v. Lockheed Engineering & Sciences Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided May 21, 1998No. 14-96-01553-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YATES, Justice.

Appellant, James Mayfield, appeals the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellee, Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Company (“Lockheed”) and the trial court’s denial of its motion for new trial. 1 In a single point of error, Mayfield complains that the trial court erred in ruling as a matter of law that he could not maintain his wrongful termination cause of action under an exception to the employment-at-will doctrine. We affirm.

Mayfield was employed with Lockheed for over five years. His last position required him to oversee the preparation and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Star-Telegram, Inc. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Harwell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. East Line & Red River Railroad v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Laird v. Lockheed Martin Engineering & Science Services Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  2. Young v. Gumfory, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
  3. PHYSIO GP, INC. v. Naifeh, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  4. United States Ex Rel. Laird v. Lockheed Martin Engineering & Science Services Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. Marren v. StoutDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API