Legal Opinion

PHYSIO GP, INC. v. Naifeh

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided February 4, 2010No. 14-08-00017-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

LESLIE B. YATES, Justice.

Appellants Tanja Saadat and Shawn Saadat appeal1 the trial court’s judgment holding them individually liable for firing appellee Natalie Naifeh for the sole reason *887that she refused to perform an illegal act. See Sabine Pilot Serv., Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733, 735 (Tex.1985). Because we hold that the Sabine Pilot doctrine should not be extended to impose liability on individual employees rather than the plaintiffs employer, we reverse and render.

BACKGROUND

Physio GP, Inc. and Physio, Ltd. (collectively “Physio”) operated an occupational and physical…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Federal Express Corp. v. DutschmannTexas Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Greenspan v. Brothers Property Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
  2. Safeshred, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bates Energy Oil & Gas v. Complete Oilfield Servs.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2019
  4. Myers v. Alutiiq International Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. TecLogistics, Inc. and Josephine Treurnie v. Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API