PHYSIO GP, INC. v. Naifeh
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
MAJORITY OPINION
LESLIE B. YATES, Justice.
Appellants Tanja Saadat and Shawn Saadat appeal1 the trial court’s judgment holding them individually liable for firing appellee Natalie Naifeh for the sole reason *887that she refused to perform an illegal act. See Sabine Pilot Serv., Inc. v. Hauck, 687 S.W.2d 733, 735 (Tex.1985). Because we hold that the Sabine Pilot doctrine should not be extended to impose liability on individual employees rather than the plaintiffs employer, we reverse and render.
BACKGROUND
Physio GP, Inc. and Physio, Ltd. (collectively “Physio”) operated an occupational and physical…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
- Federal Express Corp. v. DutschmannTexas Supreme Court · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Greenspan v. Brothers Property Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
- Safeshred, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Bates Energy Oil & Gas v. Complete Oilfield Servs.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2019
- Myers v. Alutiiq International Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- TecLogistics, Inc. and Josephine Treurnie v. Dresser-Rand Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.