Legal Opinion
East Line & Red River Railroad v. Scott
Texas Supreme Court
Decided November 20, 1888No. 2568PublishedCited by 300 opinions
Appeal from Marion. Tried below before Hon. W. P. McLean.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Chief Justice.
The general nature and result of this action is thus stated in the brief by counsel for appellant:
“ On November 10, 1886, W. F. Scott filed suit in the District Court of Marion County against appellant, alleging that he was injured by the *72appellant in 1882; that he filed suit for damages, which was compromised in 1884 by the railroad paying him $4500, and agreeing to employ Scott as engineer so long as he desired to' be so employed; that they paid the $4500, but when Scott applied for employment on July 1, 1886, they refused to employ him. Defendants deny the agreement,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Thomas v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1877
- Thouvenin v. LeaTexas Supreme Court · 1863
- Bolles v. SachsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
- Harper v. HassardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
3Cited by300 opinions
- Schroeder v. Texas Iron Works, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1991
- MBM Financial Corp. v. Woodlands Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Wornick Co. v. CasasTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Thomas v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 2006
295 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.