Legal Opinion

Johnson v. LaGrange Shoe Corporation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 22, 1955No. 36,381PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*355Knutson, Justice.

Certiorari to review a decision of the division of employment security denying unemployment benefits.

The facts are not in dispute. LaGrange Shoe Corporation owns and operates a shoe factory in Eed Wing, Minnesota. At the time here involved it employed about 150 production and maintenance employees. The United Shoe Workers of America, CIO, Local No. 211, was the sole bargaining agent for all such employees. Of the 150 employees, all except 18 were members of the union. Of the claimants here involved, all but four were members of the union. On September 17, 1952, the company…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nordling v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. In Re the Employees of Buffelen Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Moen v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  5. Jackson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bergseth v. Zinsmaster Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Anson v. Fisher Amusement Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. I. M. Dach Underwear Co. v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lamont v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  5. Stawikowski v. Collins Electric Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API