Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Watt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1895PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Kent. (Adsit, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action in trover for the conversion of one bay stallion named “Lurcher,” one bay gelding, one bay mare, and certain book accounts.

It appears that the plaintiff became financially involved in the year 1891, and had given chattel mortgages upon the property in question to several different parties. Some of the mortgages were being foreclosed, when plaintiff called upon the defendant, and requested him to take them up, and take security upon the property described. Prior to that she had become indebted to defendant in the sum of about $140, and to secure him had turned out these book…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foye v. PatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Conrow v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Thompson v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Farwell v. MyersMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Nield v. BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. DaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Frederickson v. NyeOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Grizzard v. FiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Stowe v. MatherMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Donovan v. CurtsMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API