Legal Opinion

Nield v. Burton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1882PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error to Marquette. Case. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants, who are Canadian timber merchants, for the conversion of timber cut by Donald Cameron on plaintiff’s land in the Upper Peninsula-, and sold to defendants by Cameron. The defence allowed, in the circuit court was that plaintiff had elected to waive-the tort and pursue Cameron in assumpsit, for the value of the timber.

Suit was brought by attachment in plaintiff’s name as a British subject residing in England, against Cameron as á resident of Marquette, in the United States Circuit Court for the Western District of Michigan, and levy was made on the property in dispute…

2Cited by22 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. DaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  2. Kearney Milling & Elevator Co. v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Crook v. First National Bank of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Johnson-Brinkman Commission Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  5. Mollring v. MollringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API