Legal Opinion
Harold Baldauf and Douglas J. Lang v. Amoco Oil Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1983No. 81-1598PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellants, Baldauf and Lang, filed their suit under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act. “PMPA”, 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq., seeking injunctive and other relief, with respect to a non-renewal of a full service Amoco franchise in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Appellants seek principally equitable relief to prevent the change in operations of the service station property at which appellants have operated a repair business over many years. Appellee, Amoco, gave notice that at the termination of the existing five year lease in 1981 that it intended to tear down the existing service station building…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Baldauf v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
- Davy v. Murphy Oil Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
- Davy v. Murphy Oil CorpCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
3Cited by29 opinions
- Ewing v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- May-Som Gulf, Inc. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- David P. Valentine v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- C.T. Massey D/B/A C.T. Massey Oil Company B.W. Lyons Oil Co. v. Exxon Corporation D/B/A Exxon Company, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Connie K. HAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, a New York Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.