David P. Valentine v. Mobil Oil Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge.
We consider whether, under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2801 et seq. (the PMPA), an oil company may decline to renew a gas station franchise because the franchisee will not consent to alterations in the structure and operation of the station.
Facts1
For the past ten years David Valentine has operated a gas station in Scottsdale, Arizona, under successive leases and retail-dealer contracts with Mobil. These agreements constitute a franchise relationship as defined by the PMPA. 15 U.S.C. § 2801(2).
Valentine operates what is known as a full-service gas…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- George A. Veracka v. Shell Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Nevada v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Baldauf v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1981
- Humboldt Oil Co., Inc., and J.R. Mastelotto v. Exxon Company, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Zolg v. Kelly (In re Kelly)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Terrance FrankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Connie K. HAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION, a New York Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- James C. Svela v. Union Oil Company of California, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Terry R. Beachler, Randall A. Greene, Wayne T. Neal v. Amoco Oil Company, Johnson Oil Company, and Smith Oil Company of KankakeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.