Legal Opinion
Brown v. Wargo
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 19, 1992No. Civ. 5-91-655 (WWE)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Defendants Paul Wargo and Joseph Sherbo move to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Specifically, defendants allege that the action is barred by the statute of limitations. For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be denied.
BACKGROUND
On July 19, 1988, defendants Wargo and Sherbo arrested plaintiff in Bridgeport, Connecticut and charged him with the crime of possession of cocaine with intent to sell. At the time of arrest, Wargo and Sherbo were employed as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Owens v. OkureSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Williams v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re State Police LitigationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1995