Hinky Dinky Supermarket, Inc. v. Department of Community Health
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Fer CURIAM.
Respondent appeals by leave granted from the circuit court’s order reversing respondent’s administrative decision terminating petitioner’s contract as a Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program vendor and disqualifying petitioner from WIC participation for three years. We reverse and reinstate respondent’s decision.
Respondent argues that the circuit court reversed respondent’s decision on the basis of an erroneous due process analysis. We review a circuit court’s decision on an administrative appeal to “determine whether the lower court applied the correct legal principles and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re BrockMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Boyd v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- Cummings v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Jordan v. JarvisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re HawleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- By Lo Oil Co. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. MinchMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Hinky Dinky Supermarket, Inc. v. DEPT. OF COMMUNITY HEALTHMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Davis v. State Employees' Retirement BoardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Souden v. SoudenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.