Legal Opinion

Levy v. Continental Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 15, 1924No. 14454PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

This cause of action was commenced in the district court of Tulsa county by the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against the defendants in error, to recover the value of 800 barrels of oil which the. plaintiff alleges he purchased from the defendants in connection with two oil leases and equipment thereon, and for which he paid a total consideration of $9,-500. It is admitted that the leases and all equipment, except the 800 barrels of oil, were delivered to the plaintiff. The plaintiff alleges that the oil was worth $3.50 per barrel, and he prayed judgment for $2,800.

The facts in the case…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heyn v. O'HagenMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Williams v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Hefner v. VandolahIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Ramsay v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Fant v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Continental Supply Co. v. LevySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Davies v. LahannCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  3. Dew v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Andrus v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API