Legal Opinion

Kifer v. Commission

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 28, 1997No. 89039PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSEN, Presiding Judge:

¶ 1 This appeal from an order of the Oklahoma Tax Commission denying the protest of Appellant Grapevine involves the *163question of whether Commission’s Rule 37.018 violates the intent of the Legislature’s enactment of 37 O.S.1991 § 576. We hold that it does not.

The Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, 37 O.S.1991 § 576, provides:

A A tax at the rate of twelve percent (12%) is hereby levied and imposed on the total gross receipts of a holder of a mixed beverage, caterer, or special event license, issued by the ABLE Commission, from:

1. The sale, preparation or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toxic Waste Impact Group, Inc. v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. Big Country Club, Inc. v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Edmondson v. Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  2. R & R Engineering Co. v. Board of Review OESC, Oklahoma Employment Security CommissionCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. Opinion No. (2004), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2004
  4. R & R ENGINEERING CO., INC. v. BOARD OF REVIEW OESCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API