Legal Opinion
In Re Wadman
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided February 28, 1938No. Patent Appeal 3872PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of. the United States Patent Office, affirming in all but two claims the decision of the Examiner which rejected claims 1 to 20, 22, 28 to 33, and 36. Claims 17 and 19 were allowed by the Board. Ten apparatus claims including 17 and 19, have been allowed.
During the oral argument here, appellant moved to dismiss the appeal with respect to claims 1 to 5, inclusive, 11, 13, 14, IS, 29, 30, 31, and 33, which motion will be granted.
Of the claims remaining for consideration, claims 7, 16, and 36 are illustrative, and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mantle Lamp Co. v. Aluminum Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- In Re ErnstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- In Re WatsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- In Re McCurdyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- In re DannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Application of Zoltan TARCZYHORNOCHCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- In Re WashburnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Application of MiddletonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- Application of Zoltan TARCZYHORNOCHCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.