Legal Opinion

In re Dann

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 2, 1931No. 2594PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, Judge

Nine claims are before us on appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office affirming the action of the examiner *1032disallowing tliem. Ten were in this appeal but the one numbered Y was withdrawn during the argument before us.

The alleged invention is, in the application, designated as “ new ' and useful improvements in liquid reservoir.”

More specifically it comprises a combination of elements, which combination results in a reservoir for writing fluid — ink—provided with an inclined rigidly positioned conduit designed to receive a penholder, with pen therein, in such manner…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re BarnettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  2. In Re WadmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  3. Tulchin v. Perey Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. Application of NeelyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API