Legal Opinion

Application of Middleton

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 4, 1948No. Patent Appeal 5449PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the rejection by the Primary Examiner of claims 17, 18, and 19 in appellant’s application for a patent for an invention for a method of introducing reactants to a chemical process. Claim 16 of the application was allowed by the board.

Claim 17, which is typical of the three rejected claims, reads: “In an alkylation process which includes reaction of an olefin with an isoparaffin in the presence of a liquid acid catalyst; the method of admixing fresh catalyst and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re ErnstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  2. In Re WatsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. In Re WadmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Application of Walter D. Bernhart and William A. FetterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. Application of HorvathCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  3. In Re WashburnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  4. Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Diamond v. DiehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API