Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re McCurdy

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 15, 1935No. Patent Appeal 3078PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLAND, Associate Judge.

Appellant has here appealed from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, which affirmed the action of the Examiner in refusing to allow claims 4, 5, 6, 11, and 12 of an application which relates to means and method for transmitting power over an extending transmission line. Claims 5 and 6 are regarded as illustrative and follow:

“5. The method of transmitting power over an extending transmission line, which method consists in causing a lagging voltage drop across an impedance in series with the line, causing lagging current to flow through…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. In Re ErnstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  3. In Re WatsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. In re WeeksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Application of Zoltan TARCZYHORNOCHCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. Application of HorvathCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
  3. In re BarnettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. In Re WadmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  5. In re McKeeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API