Legal Opinion
Lee v. Rich
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 30, 2016No. G051838PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*273Opinion
FYBEL, J.—
INTRODUCTION
Howard Rich purchased a single-family residence at an execution sale conducted to satisfy a judgment against Yung-Shen Steven Lee. Rich was a third party purchaser; the plaintiff and judgment creditor was Spyglass Hill Community Association (the HOA), which managed the common interest development of which the residence was a part. After the sale, the trial court granted Lee’s motion to vacate the judgment on the ground it had been obtained by the HOA through fraud. Soon thereafter, the court granted Lee’s motion for restitution and cancelled the sheriff’s deed to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Doppes v. Bentley Motors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Odell v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Save Our Bay, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Washington Mutual Bank v. BlechmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Contreras Curiel Corp. v. Superior Court CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2020