Legal Opinion
Washington Mutual Bank v. Blechman
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 4, 2007No. B191125PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DOI TODD, Acting P. J.
Property owned by appellant Robert A. Blechman was sold through foreclosure by respondents Washington Mutual Bank (WAMU) and its trustee California Reconveyance Company (CRC) to respondent Gladmac, Inc., as trustee for the Lucile Trust UDT 9/6/02 (Gladmac). In a prior lawsuit, Blechman sued WAMU, CRC and Gladmac to set aside the trustee’s sale. WAMU and CRC demurred to Blechman’s complaint, but Blechman dismissed WAMU and CRC before the demurrer was heard, and proceeded by default against Gladmac. The default judgment declared the trustee’s sale null and void and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kraus v. Willow Park Public Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Greif v. DulleaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Sierra Club, Inc. v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Color-Vue, Inc. v. AbramsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Save Our Bay, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Cerritos v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- United Supreme Council v. United Supreme Council of the Ancient Accepted Scottish Rite for the 33 Degree of FreemasonryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- Banc of America Leasing & Capital, LLC v. 3 Arch Trustee Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Ranch At the Falls LLC v. O'Neal, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Ramirez v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.