Legal Opinion

Taxicab Drivers' Local Union No. 889 v. Pittman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 22, 1957No. 37021PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was initiated by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, to recover damages for the alleged wrongful actions of the various defendants below in instituting and conducting disciplinary action against him within the defendant labor unions and thereafter causing the loss of his job. The initial petition joined several individuals, the plaintiff’s employer, and the plaintiffs in error as defendants; but all save the present plaintiffs in error were omitted from the second amended petition upon which the action was tried for the second time after motions for new trial were sustained…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cason v. Glass Bottle Blowers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Brennan v. United Hatters of North America, Local No. 17Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  3. Kurn v. RadencicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  4. Sweetman v. BarrowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  5. Sullivan v. BarrowsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Silver v. New York Stock ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Tuffy's, Inc. v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  3. A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  5. William Michael Averitt v. Southland Motor Inn of Oklahoma, D/B/A Sheraton Inn-Skyline East Hotel and Sheraton Inns, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API