Legal Opinion

Sloman v. Cutler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1932No. Docket No. 113, Calendar No. 35,853PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This suit by plaintiffs, husband and wife, named as vendors of property, owned by husband, in an executory land contract, against defendant Cutler, assignee of the purchaser, Rose M. Braidel, is in assumpsit' to recover instalments of the purchase price. Defendant had judgment. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The contract provides against assignment by the purchaser without written consent of the vendor, and this is coupled with a provision for forfeiture for breach.

Defendant accepted the contract by assignment from the purchaser, the vendors consenting thereto, and the assignee assuming performance…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mandlebaum v. McDonellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Smith v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hull v. HostettlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Smith v. LloydMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Moffit v. SederlundMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Lantis v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Majerus v. SantoNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Pellerito v. WeberMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API