Legal Opinion

Keppen v. Rice

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1932No. Docket No. 57, Calendar No. 36,093PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

A summary judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff in an action at law to recover the unpaid balance on a land contract. Defendant appealed.

The plaintiff is survivor of William Aben and Annie Aben, his wife, vendors in a land contract. Hyman D. Dorman was the vendee. He assigned to the defendant, Esther Rice. In the assignment she assumed and agreed to pay the unpaid balance. At the same time and in the same instrument, the plaintiff consented to the assignment and released Mr. Dorman from further liability on the purchase price. Defendant went into possession and made some payments on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harrington-Wiard Co. v. Blomstrom Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Tapert v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Bacon v. BatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Imperial Hotels Corporation v. Arthur P. Dore Jay Ambe Corporation and Dore Development Company, Mainstream Capital CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  2. George Realty Co. v. Gulf Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Walter Toebe & Co. v. Receiver of F Yeager Bridge & Culvert Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Perry Drug Stores v. CSK Auto Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Chicago Boulevard Land Co. v. NuttenMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API