Legal Opinion

State v. Zinsli

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 30, 1998No. 95-7159; CA A97060PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.

In this driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) case, the state appeals from a pretrial order of dismissal. ORS 138.060(1). Defendant’s motion to dismiss the case was based on the state’s loss of a videotape of defendant’s performance of field sobriety tests (FSTs), which defendant claimed was both material and favorable to his defense. We reverse and remand.

The facts are taken from the arresting officer’s testimony at the hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss and from the officer’s incident report, which defendant introduced as an exhibit at the hearing. The facts are undisputed…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Pena v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  2. State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. FaunceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State v. ThorneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API