State v. Zinsli
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, P. J.
In this driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII) case, the state appeals from a pretrial order of dismissal. ORS 138.060(1). Defendant’s motion to dismiss the case was based on the state’s loss of a videotape of defendant’s performance of field sobriety tests (FSTs), which defendant claimed was both material and favorable to his defense. We reverse and remand.
The facts are taken from the arresting officer’s testimony at the hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss and from the officer’s incident report, which defendant introduced as an exhibit at the hearing. The facts are undisputed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Pena v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
- State v. BrayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. CartwrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. FaunceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. ThorneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.