Legal Opinion

Diehl v. Crump

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 25, 1919No. 10397PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; Geo. C. Crumpi, Judge. Original application by C. H. Diehl for prohibition against 1-Ion. George C. Crump, as Judge of the District Court for the Ninth Judicial District, and the District Court for Okfuskee County, Okla.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This is an original application for a writ prohibiting George C. Crump, as judge of the district court of Okfuskee county from trying a certain criminal ease wherein the petitioner is charged upon an indictment with a violation of the election laws of the state.

The petition of the plaintiff charges in effect that, when he was called upon to plead to the indictment filed against him in the criminal court, he filed the affidavit prescribed by section 14, chapter 135, Session Laws 1917, wherein he stated that he could not have a fair and impartial trial before said district court by reason of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leatherock v. LawterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Ex parte N. K. Fairbank Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1912

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. U'ren v. BagleyOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Roberts v. LedgerwoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Key v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API