Legal Opinion

Kremer v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided September 8, 2004No. 03-419PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Plaintiffs, insureds, appeal an order of the superior court granting summary judgment for defendant insurer on plaintiffs’ breach of an insurance contract claim. Plaintiffs contend the court erred in concluding that their title insurance was not triggered by what they allege to be a municipal permit violation, even though the town has not found or alleged any violation. We affirm.

¶ 2. As an initial matter, the significance of our ruling in this case is likely limited as the Legislature has declared, subsequent to the facts giving rise to this case, that no encumbrance on title results…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. White v. Quechee Lakes Landowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  3. Poplaski v. LamphereSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. In Re VitaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  5. Conservation Law Foundation v. BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Webb v. LeClairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  2. Webb v. LeclairSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  3. Daniel Delorm v. Town of Hancock & Norman SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
  4. Gizmo Realty/VKR Assoc., LLC Act 250 PermitVermont Superior Court · 2008
  5. Highlands Development Co., LLC & JAM Golf, LLC Master Plan ApplicationVermont Superior Court · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API