Legal Opinion
Corr v. Smith
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 12, 2008No. 102687PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColbert, J.
¶ 1 The single issue confronting the Court is whether the trial court had the statutory authority to grant the plaintiffs’ application for attorney fees and costs following their successful effort to have a trust amendment and will set aside because of undue influence. We conclude that it did under the facts presented. We vacate the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals and affirm the decision of the trial court.
I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 To fully analyze the statute at the heart of this matter, we must delve, to the degree possible, into the facts underlying the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Morgan v. Galilean Health Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Cooper v. State ex rel. Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- In Re Estate of HolcombSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Russell v. Chase Investment Services, Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Margaret Blair Trust v. BlairCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2016
- GHOUSSOUB v. YAMMINESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- HALL v. DEARMONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- DRYE v. TARGETCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.