Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co. v. Haynes
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The issues here arise out of a Federal Employers' Liability Act ("FELA") case. One of the primary issues is whether the trial court erred in dismissing the third-party complaint filed by the railroad against the plaintiff's co-employee on the ground that the FELA did not permit the railroad to maintain such a third-party suit against a co-employee of the injured party.
The other issues arise out of the trial of the plaintiff's FELA action against the railroad, and are as follows: 1) whether the trial court erred in excluding evidence offered by the railroad that the plaintiff was receiving…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Vest v. GaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Haischer v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. GardnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. v. CredeurSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Eastman v. R. Warehousing & Port Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- Waisonovitz v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006