Legal Opinion

In Re Breast Implant Product Liability Litigation

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 1, 1998No. 24793PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TOAL, Acting Chief Justice:

We granted a writ of certiorari to review certain questions pertaining to the liability of health care providers (“Healthcare Defendants”) for use of medical devices, such as breast implants.

Factual/Procedural Background

In August 1993, Chief Justice David W. Harwell assigned Judge Henry F. Floyd to dispose of all pre-trial motions and other matters arising out of the breast implant litigation then pending, and to be subsequently filed, in this state’s court system. In April 1995, Chief Justice Ernest A. Finney, Jr. issued an order granting permission to Judge Floyd…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cunningham v. MacNeal Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Magrine v. KrasnicaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Branch v. Willis-Knighton Medical CenterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  4. Cafazzo v. Central Medical Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Hector v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Brandt v. Boston Scientific Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Fields v. J. Haynes Waters Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  3. Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Laffitte v. Bridgestone Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Royer v. Catholic Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API