Legal Opinion
Royer v. Catholic Medical Center
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 23, 1999No. 98-060PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The plaintiffs, Ira A. and Rachel M. Royer, appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Sullivan, J.) granting a motion to dismiss in favor of the defendant, Catholic Medical Center (CMC). We affirm.
The plaintiffs have pleaded the following facts. In September 1991, Ira Royer underwent total knee replacement surgery at CMC. As part of the procedure, a prosthetic knee, provided by CMC, was surgically implanted. In April 1993, Royer complained to his doctor that the pain in his knee was worse than it had been before the surgery. His doctors determined that the prosthesis was defective, and in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Vogel v. VogelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- Perlmutter v. Beth David HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Thibault v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Buttrick v. Arthur Lessard & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- Siciliano v. Capitol City Shows, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hollander v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Kelleher v. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- State of New Hampshire v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2015
- Precourt v. Fairbank Reconstruction Corp.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.