Legal Opinion

Laffitte v. Bridgestone Corp.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 2, 2009No. 26606PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

Chief Justice TOAL:

In this product liability case, we granted a petition for a writ of certiorari in our original jurisdiction to review the trial court’s discovery order compelling Petitioner Bridgestone Corporation (Bridgestone) to turn over its steel belt skim stock formula, classified as a trade secret, to Respondent Russell Laffitte. For the reasons detailed below, we find that Respondent has not shown that knowledge of Bridgestone’s trade secret is necessary in order for Respondent to litigate this product liability action. Consequently, the trial court’s order…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  2. In Re Continental General Tire, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Shreveport, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
  4. In Re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Baggerly v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. McKellips v. Kumho Tire Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  3. Hollman v. WoolfsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Binney v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  5. Tempel v. South Carolina State Election CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API