Legal Opinion
Pica v. Sarno
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 5, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-327PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLIN, District Judge.
This matter is opened before the Court upon the motion of defendant Morris Sarno for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. The Court has decided the motion upon the written submissions of the parties, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78. For the reasons stated below, the motion for summary judgment on the issues of liability and compensatory damages will be denied. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment to dismiss the claim for punitive damages will be granted.
BACKGROUND
In November, 1991, plaintiff Joseph Pica placed a wooden sign…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Knoeffler v. Town of MamakatingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Miller v. City of East OrangeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- FOULKE v. TOWNSHIP OF CHERRY HILLDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024