Legal Opinion
Knoeffler v. Town of Mamakating
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 15, 2000No. 98 Civ. 6683 WCCPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Paul Knoeffler brings this action challenging the constitutionality of three municipal sign ordinances of defendant Town of Mamakating (“Mamakating” or the “Town”). Plaintiff also seeks damages for violation of his constitutional rights, allegedly resulting from enforcement of these sign ordinances. In addition to Mamakating, plaintiff brings this action against defendant John Grifo, building inspector for Mamakating, in his individual capacity. 1 Plaintiff now moves for summary judgment on liability. For the reasons stated…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Congregation Rabbinical College of Tartikov, Inc. v. Village of PomonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Murphy v. Zoning Com'n of Town of New MilfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Sugarman v. Village of ChesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- City of Painesville Building Department v. Dworken & Bernstein Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- Knoeffler v. Town of MamakatingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.