Legal Opinion
Miller v. City of East Orange
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 20, 2007No. Civil Action 05-2023 (WHW)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
WALLS, Senior District Judge.
Defendants City of East Orange and East Orange Police Department (the “East Orange Defendants”) move for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Defendant Charles Grimes moves to dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 78, defendants’ motions are decided without oral argument. The East Orange Defendants’ motion is granted. Defendant Grimes’ motion is denied.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Vaughn Miller and his company VLEM Enterprises provided…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Benjamin v. East Orange Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2013