Legal Opinion
Remington-Rand Inc. v. Emory University
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided January 12, 1938No. 12032PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hutcheson, Justice.
1. While as a general rule the right to claim the benefit of the statute of limitations is one personal to the debtor, it may also be claimed by the transferee of the debtor when it is sought to subject the property transferred to him to the payment of the debt. Pendley v. Powers, 129 Ga. 69, 71 (58 S. E. 653); Dawson v. Callaway, 18 Ga. 573; Krauss v. National Bank of Brunswick, 184 Ga. 456 (192 S. E. 12). Accordingly, in a suit in equity against an alleged fraudulent grantee, seeking to set aside the alleged fraudulent transfer and to subject the property to the payment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wylly v. S. Z. Collins & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Sheldon & Co. v. Emory UniversitySupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Strickland v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Dawson v. CallawaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
- Spinks v. LaGrange Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hullett v. CousinArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Jahner v. JacobNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State of Rio De Janeiro v. E. H. Rollins & Sons, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Jones v. Board of Regents of the University SystemCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Mukamal v. Nat'l Christian Charitable Found., Inc. (In re Palm Beach Fin. Partners, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.