Legal Opinion

State of Rio De Janeiro v. E. H. Rollins & Sons, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 19, 1949PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.

E. H. Bollins & Sons (as its corporate name then was, being now United Associates, Incorporated, defendant above named), failed, in January, 1932, to pay to plaintiff, the State of Bio De Janeiro, a balance which then became due from the former to the latter, on a contract for the sale and purchase of the State’s bonds. This suit was commenced in December, 1940, nearly nine years after the default. Special Term, as affirmed by the Appellate Division, arrived at these conclusions:

1. That, since the relationship between the two parties to the bond sale agreement was contractual only, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Surety Co. v. ConnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Buttles v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Blumenthal v. BlumenthalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Remington-Rand Inc. v. Emory UniversitySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  5. Briggs v. . AustinNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. MFS/Sun Life Trust-High Yield Series v. Van Dusen Airport Services. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Hullett v. CousinArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. George R. Desmond, Trustee v. Marilyn J. MoffieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  4. Jahner v. JacobNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Pfohl Brothers Landfill Site Steering Committee v. Allied Waste Sys., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API