Allstate Insurance Company v. Meeks
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, C. J.
This case involves the narrow issue whether the benefits under an uninsured motorist provision in a liability policy issued to a named insured on one motor vehicle owned by him extend to the named insured while he is operating another motor vehicle owned by him and not covered in such liability policy. The lower court held that in such circumstances the benefits do extend to the named insured. For the reasons to be stated, we affirm.
The appeal is before us on a stipulation of facts which may be summarized thus: On March 20, 1963 Allstate Insurance Company issued to James Thomas Meeks a policy…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Insurance Co. of North America v. PerrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Harleysville Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1962
3Cited by34 opinions
- Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Bradley v. Mid-Century InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Wickline v. US Fidelity & Guar. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.