Lopez v. Schultz & Lindsay Construction Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
OMAN, Judge.
Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment denying their claim and dismissing their complaint for workmen’s compensation benefits. They sought recovery of benefits as a dependent father and mother of their deceased son under § 59-10-18.7 (D), N.M.S.A. 1953, which provides in part:
“D. If there be neither widow, widower, nor children, compensation may be paid to the father and mother or the survivor of them, if dependent to any extent upon the workman for support at the time of the workman’s death,
The workman in this case was a nineteen year old son of plaintiffs, who had just…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mascarenas v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Christensen v. DysartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
- Hales v. Van CleaveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
- Luna v. FloresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
- Taylor v. McBeeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Adams v. Loffland Brothers Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Lucero v. Los Alamos Constructors, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Dibble v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- Stewart v. BarnesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Garza v. W. A. Jourdan, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.