Legal Opinion

Mascarenas v. Kennedy

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1964No. 7466PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOBLE, Justice.

J. L. Kennedy, the employer, and Peerless Insurance Company, his insurance carrier, appellants, have appealed from a judgment awarding claimant, Pedro Mascarenas, appellee, total permanent workmen’s compensation benefits with a ten per cent penalty increase because of the employer’s failure to furnish a safety device.

Appellants attack the court’s findings and conclusions and, in turn, the judgment upon the ground that the trial court applied an erroneous principle of law in arriving at its findings of fact and conclusions of law, as is evidenced by conclusion 6(a), which reads:

“…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Stevenson v. Lee Moor Contracting Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Wilson v. Rowan Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Lipe v. BradburyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Ehman v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ortega v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. ChapmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Cordova v. Taos Ski Valley, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Gammon v. Ebasco Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  5. American Tank & Steel Corp. v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API