Legal Opinion

Rainwater v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 4, 1984No. 13596PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Movant filed a motion under Rule 27.26, seeking to vacate a conviction for second degree murder. See 602 S.W.2d 233. Following an evidentiary hearing the trial court made extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment denying the motion. Movant appeals.

Movant contends that the trial court erred because he received ineffective assistance of counsel in the criminal proceeding because his attorney failed to, pursue possible defenses, failed to inform him of lesser-included offenses, waived the presen-tence investigation without his consent and failed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. HolmesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. State v. RainwaterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Burns v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Owens v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. O'NEAL v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Laws v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Tatum v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Chamberlain v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Mills v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API