Legal Opinion

Mills v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1988No. 53799PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Presiding Judge.

Movant re-appeals denial of post-conviction relief under former Rule 27.26. Mov-ant’s original appeal resulted in a remand for an evidentiary hearing. Mills v. State, 723 S.W.2d 71 (Mo.App.1986). Movant sought relief from consecutive sentences on five counts of armed robbery for the robbery of five patrons at the Peach Pit Tavern.

The direct appeal following jury trial, conviction and sentences was decided in State v. Mills, 671 S.W.2d 437 (Mo.App.1984). The state offered evidence to prove defendant’s guilt on the charged crimes consisting of: (1) two eyewitnesses who…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. McCrary v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. McCoy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Hamil v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. State v. LawrenceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Tidwell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Trice v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API