Legal Opinion

Chamberlain v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 1986No. 50902PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHAN, Presiding Judge.

Movant sought Rule 27.26 relief from the judgments of conviction entered upon his pleas of guilty to burglary in the second degree and failure to return to confinement. As grounds he alleged his counsel was ineffective, his pleas were involuntary, and the state was guilty of selective and retaliatory prosecution. The trial court denied relief without affording movant an evidentiary hearing. Movant appeals. We affirm.

Movant asserts that had the trial court granted him an evidentiary hearing he would have established his guilty pleas were invalidated by his counsel’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. State v. CodySupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  4. State v. StidhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Wade v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SimmsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Robinson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Jones v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Schofield v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. BowlingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API