Legal Opinion

Tatum v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1985No. 14066PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Movant was convicted of assault in the first degree and sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment. That conviction was affirmed on appeal. See State v. Tatum, 653 S.W.2d 241 (Mo.App.1983). Movant filed a motion under Rule 27.26 seeking to vacate the conviction because he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Following an evidentiary hearing the trial court made extensive findings of fact and conclusions of law and entered judgment denying the motion. Movant appeals.

To sustain a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel movant must establish that there was a reasonable…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trimble v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. State v. TatumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Rainwater v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Haslip v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. State v. AyersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. RichardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. KnightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. State v. MadewellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API