Legal Opinion

Oedekoven v. Oedekoven

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1975No. 4478PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice.

One serious question, as we see it, arises in this appeal: Is contempt the proper path to travel when a property settlement agreement is only ratified and confirmed by the divorce decree, without incorporating a direction that the parties comply with its terms? There are other significant queries raised by appellant intertwined with that problem which we shall dispose of at the time they are reached.

A property settlement agreement was placed in the court file on February 3, 1969, and noted on the docket. The appellant-defendant and the appellee-plaintiff, at an uncontested…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Jacoby v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Fairchild v. MathewsIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Star Manufacturing Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Western Air Lines, Inc. v. HollenbeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Allen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Jahn v. BurnsWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Douglas Reservoirs Water Users Ass'n v. CrossWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. White v. FisherWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  5. City of Gillette v. Hladky Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API