Legal Opinion

Sandquist & Snow, Inc. v. Kellogg

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 13, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

P. H. Kellogg owner of a certain mortgage by assignment which covered a certain lot in Coral Gables filed his bill to foreclose same and therein made Sandquist and Snow, Inc., among others, a party defendant, and alleged that Sandquist and Snow, Inc., has or claims to have some interest in the premises but that such interest is inferior and subordinate to the mortgage of P. H. Kellogg, complainant.

Sandquist and Snow, Inc. filed its answer, and later filed its cross-bill, making P. H. Kellogg and others defendants upon whom process was duly served, and therein alleged that it is a contractor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Quinn Plumbing Co. Inc. v. New Miami Shores Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  2. Bowery v. BabbitSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Peoples Bank of Jax. v. Va. Bridge Iron Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
  4. Guaranty Title & Trust Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  5. Booker Co. Inc. v. Leon H. Watson, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. BasnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Kurz v. Pappas Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932
  3. Silverstein v. WakefieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  4. Mediterranean Corp. v. PappasSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  5. Kurz v. Pappas Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API