Legal Opinion
Silverstein v. Wakefield
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 21, 1959No. 58-691PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
112 So.2d 406 (1959)
Moe SILVERSTEIN and Minnie Silverstein, his wife, Appellants,
v.
Clinton C. WAKEFIELD and Ruth Wakefield, his wife, Appellees.
No. 58-691.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
May 21, 1959.
Rehearing Denied June 17, 1959.
Monroe Gelb, Miami, for appellants.
Julius H. Erstling, Miami, for appellees.
HORTON, Judge.
This is an appeal from a final decree in chancery in which the chancellor found that a $2,000 mortgage and note, given by the appellees to the appellants, was usurious.
The appellees were the owners of certain real property in Dade County, Florida, and…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shaffran v. HolnessSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Benson v. First Tr. Svgs. Bk., as TrusteeSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Shaffran v. HolnessDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Chandler and Chandler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Cadman v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williamson v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Lady Cyana Divers, Inc. v. CarvalhoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- WB Dunn Co., Inc. v. Mercantile Credit CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- DuPont Plaza, Inc. v. Samuel Kipnis Family FoundationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961