Legal Opinion

In Re the Personal Restraint of Peterson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 13, 2000No. 43370-9-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAppelwick, J.

In this personal restraint petition, Michael E. Peterson seeks relief from an Indeterminate Sentence Review Board’s (Board) decision to rescind his final discharge. The Board had earlier “paroled” Peterson from his pre-Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA) sentences, so that he could begin serving time on sentences he received under the SRA. Three years later, the Board issued Peterson a final discharge pursuant to RCW 9.96.050, which requires the Board to discharge an offender who has served three years of parole. We hold that RCW 9.96.050 does not apply to this case because the Board did not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kramarevcky v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Wilson v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Moses v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re MinesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In re the Personal Restraint of MinesWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Mount Adams School District v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. In re the Personal Restraint of LopezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: Joseph Russell PoolCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API